A true students’ mind-set is based
on deductive reasoning and utilizes all of the information that it has in its
arsenal in order to draw conclusions. Although not all students may understand
the meaning of this, those who do choose to abide by this concept are
skeptical. The authors of Freakonomics
(2009), Stephen J. Dubner and Steven D. Levitt, named these individuals
Freakonomists. Freakonomics is based
on a series of bizarre complex questions, followed by an extensive analysis of large
quantities of data that are answered through a process of deductive reasoning.
Despite the fact that the questions presented may, at first sight, appear to be
nothing but jokes, they are in fact concrete questions. One question presented
is, “What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in common?” Because Freakonomics implements critical
thinking and does so excellently, based on my criteria, this book would receive
a score of four, with a perfect score ranging to a five. The reason that Freakonomics would receive a score of
four is because of the informal style of writing. However, the authors do an
excellent job of presenting basic knowledge necessary to understand difficult
topics without disrupting the flow of the text, which allows you to analyze the
information and make decisions based on scenarios.
The decision of
whether or not Freakonomics is the
type of book you would enjoy was made long before you reached this portion of
the book review. If you stopped to think about the question presented earlier,
then Freakonomics is a book that will
introduce you to a new way of thinking; however, if you simply sped through the
question without much thought, then this book perhaps may not be the best
choice for you, but may certainly be a decent one. That is because Freakonomics depends on the craving of
information to diffuse ideas across smoothly to the readers, and if not much
thought is given to the questions presented, then Freakonomics’ greatest aspects are nullified. However, I would
recommend Freakonomics to every
student with hopes to pursue a greater education because of the importance of
the contents of the epilogue: Two Paths to Harvard.
No comments:
Post a Comment